Mrs. Vasantha Krishnaraj v. Sri Pandey V.K.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed the contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a prior order. The Court noted that while the main entitlement was complied with, grievances regarding interest were not part of the impugned order and should be pursued via fresh action or representation.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.07.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Cont.P.No.571 of 2018
Vasantha Krishnaraj .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Sri Pandey V.K., The General Manager (P), Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation Limited having its Corporate Office at Scope Complex, No.7, Institutional Area, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
2.J.V.N.Rao,
The General Manager (P), Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation Limited having its Branch Office at Chennai House, No.7, Esplanade, Chennai - 108. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for contempt and wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court and for violating the order dated 13.10.2014 in W.A.No.324 of 2013. For Petitioner .. Mr.R.Swaminathan For Respondent .. Mr.M.Santhanaraman
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition regarding non-compliance of the order dated 13.10.2014 in W.A.No.324 of 2013 stands closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vasantha Krishnaraj
- respondent
Sri Pandey V.K.
- respondent
J.V.N.Rao
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court