M.Suresh v. Vikram Kapur
Case brief
What is this about?
A summary contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act was closed by the High Court of Madras after the respondent submitted that a previous order was complied with. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed. No Costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Cont.P.No.552 of 2019
in
W.P.No.19510 of 2018
1.M.Suresh
2.R.Panjali
3.N.Ramalingam
4.R.Arivu
5.E.Rani
6.D.Govindammal
7.M.Lakshmi
8.M.Jayagandhi
9.S.Poongkodi
10.M.Partiban
11.K.Amudha
12.E.Ammayi
13. N.Arunraj
14. S.Shanthi
15. M.Hamavathy ... Petitioners
Vs
Vikram Kapur
The Chairman,
Tamilnadu Generation & Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO),
No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of
the Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondent
for her wilful and intentional failure to comply with the
order of this Hon'ble Court dated 31.07.2018 made in
W.P.No.19510 of 2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Jayachandran For Respondents : Mr.Anand Gopalan Mrs.Devi Rudra for T.S.Gopalan & Co
2
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Suresh
- respondent
Vikram Kapur
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court