Petitioner moved a contempt petition for disobedience of an order directing payment of sums. The Court found the interim order was complied with and closed the petition along with connected applications. (23 words)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
CONT.P.No.501 of 2019
and
SUB APPLICATIONS(OS) NOS.132 & 133 of 2019
Resham Mahtani .. Petitioner
Versus
1.Shabna Akmal
2.Akmaluddin .. Respondents
Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for
their willful acts of disobedience of the order dated
12.02.2019 passed by this Court in A.No.202 of 2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.Madhanbabu
For Respondents: Mr.G.Dakshinamoorthy
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for their willful acts of disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2019 passed by this Court in A.Nos.202 & 203 of 2019.
2
within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of the order to the credit of the applications and thereafter another sum of Rs.1,00,000/- has to be paid within another fifteen days thereafter. As the respondents disobeyed the same, the above contempt petition has been filed.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
smi/CO/29/07/2017
Resham Mahtani
Shabna Akmal
Akmaluddin
Pushpa Sathyanarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
