Contempt petition under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioners on two consecutive hearings.
Contempt petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.2671 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Contempt Petition No.2671 of 2018
1.R.Kothandaraman 2.Sheela Kothandaraman
Mr.T.Udayakumar
... Petitioners
Vs
... Respondent
PRAYER:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt Court Acts to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the order dated 30.11.2017 passed by this Court in O.A. No.1135 of 2017 and in final orders dated 27.06.2018 passed in O.A. No.1135 of 2017 and connected O.P. No.920 of 2017.
For Petitioners : No Appearance
The matter was listed for hearing on 14.11.2019. However,
there was no representation when it was called and hence it was directed to be listed today (15.11.2019) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is called, there
1/2
Contempt Petition No.2671 of 2018
is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the Contempt Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rkp
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
Smi/03.12.2019
2/2
R. Kothandaraman and Sheela Kothandaraman
Respondent
Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
