This brief order notes the submission by the Government Advocate that the respondent had complied with the court order via a closed enquiry. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed without further adjudication or punishment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Cont.P.No.2483 of 2018
A.S.Sundari Singamuthu
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.C.Chandru, The Inspector of Police, R-8, Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 16.03.2018 passed in Crl.O.P.No.8156 of 2018 and has committed the Contempt of Courts Act.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Balaji
For Respondent : Mr.B.Arulmozhi Maran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
Heard Mr.M.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.Arulmozhi Maran, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.
2
consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) on instructions, submitted that based on the petitioner's complaint, an enquiry has been conducted and closed on 23.03.2018.
mrm/kkn
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
PS/01/02/2019
To
A.S.Sundari Singamuthu
Mr.C.Chandru
M.S.Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
