Dcb Bank Ltd, v. P.Ponnian
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed alleging non-compliance with an order dated 04.01.2018 in W.P. No. 34306 of 2017. The court found that the respondents produced proceedings under Section 14(1) of SARFAESI Act as compliant and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed on the basis of compliance made by the contemnors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P No 2064 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.09.2019 Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN CONT. P. No.2064 of 2018
M/s.DCB Bank Ltd.,
rep. by its Senior Manager ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.P.Ponniah,
The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2.Wilfred Kitchingh,
The Tahsildar,
Pallavaram. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondents for violating the
order passed on 04.01.2018 in W.P.No.34306 of 2017.
For Petitioner .. Ms.Christella
For Respondent .. Mr.M.Elumalai,
Govt. Advocate
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J .]
Alleging that the order dated 04.01.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.34306 of 2017 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Page 1 of 2
CONT P No 2064 of 2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have sufficiently complied with the earlier order dated 04.01.2018 in W.P. No. 34306 of 2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. DCB Bank Ltd.
- respondent
P. Ponniah
- respondent
Wilfred Kitchingh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court