S.Mathiyalagan v. Thiru.K.Pandi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of an earlier order regarding pension and retirement benefits, the court closed the petition as the respondents submitted a calculation memo showing the entire dues were paid.
What did the court decide?
None. The petitioner failed to appear and the court closed the petition based on the respondents' calculation memo.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1992 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 04.11.2019
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Cont.P.No.1992 of 2018
S.Mathiyalagan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru.K.Pandi,
The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
Limited,
No.12, Ramakrishna Road,
Salem-636 007.
2.Thiru.Muniyappan
The Administrator,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme,
Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai,
Chennai – 600002. ... Respondents
Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for their
willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.32484 of 2016 dated 19.09.2016 as per the Contempt
of Court Act.
For petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Ms.S.Rajeni Ramadass
1/4
Cont.P.No.1992 of 2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is guilty of willful disobedience of the order dated 19.09.2016 given the calculation memo submitted by respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Mathiyalagan
- respondent
Thiru.K.Pandi
- respondent
Thiru.Muniyappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court