Disposed

K.S. Saravanan v. Tmt. Mageswari

Madras HC9 Jul 2019CONT P/1865/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This contempt petition and connected application were disposed of after the contemnor filed an affidavit and produced records proving compliance with a prior order dated 18.05.2017 regarding mandatory training. Despite initial non-compliance, the court concluded the matter once evidence of attendance was produced and dispensed with the contemnor's personal appearance.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed on satisfaction of compliance; sub application closed; personal appearance dispensed with.

K.S. Saravanan Vs Tmt. Mageswari — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.07.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

Contempt Petition No. 1865 of 2018 and Sub Application No.273 of 2019

¶7

K.S. Saravanan

¶8

... Petitioner in Cont. Petition/ 1^st Respondent in Sub Application

¶9

Versus

¶10

Tmt. Mageswari Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶11

... Respondent in Cont. Petition 2^nd Respondent in Sub Application

¶12

Thiru Pradeep Yadav I.A.S., Secretary Education Science and Technology (H.S.II) Department, St. George Fort, Chennai 600 009.

¶13

... Petitioner/ Proposed Respondent in Sub Application

¶14

Sub Application No.273 of 2019:

¶15

To dispense with the personal appearance of the

¶16

petitioner herein before this Hon'ble Court on 08.07.2019 as directed by this Hon'ble Court in Cont.P.No.1865 of 2018.

¶17

Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of

¶18

Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for committing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Contempt of Court by their willful deliberate disobedience

¶19

¶20

of the order passed by this Court dated 18.05.2017 in

¶21

W.P.No.22810 of 2015.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar

¶23

For Respondent : Mr. C.Munusamy Special Government Pleader

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to

¶26

punish the respondent for having willfully disobeyed the orders of this Court dated 18.05.2017 made in WP No.22810 of 2015.

¶27

Since the orders of this Court were not complied with, despite repeated assurances given by the learned Government Advocate, I had directed appearance of the Education Secretary as well as the Contemnor on 08.07.2019. Yesterday when the matter was listed, the contemnor was present in person and the learned Government Advocate had produced the proceedings of the Contemnor bearing RC.No.3396/B2/2017 dated 01.07.2019, in and by which, the

¶28

petitioner had been permitted to undergo short term training course at DIET. However, the proceedings did not

¶29

state as to the dates on which the training is to be undertaken by the petitioner. Hence, I posted the matter

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ today, requiring the contemnor to file an affidavit setting

¶31

¶32

out the period during which the petitioner will be sent for training.

¶33

Accordingly, the contemnor has filed an affidavit

¶34

stating that the petitioner will be sent for three months short term training course, from 08.07.2019 to 22.11.2019, in para 7 of the said affidavit, it is stated as follows:

¶35

petitioner has also joined in the 3months

¶36

short term course training on 08.07.2019,

¶37

the Principal District Institute of Education and Training, Krishnagiri vide his letter in Na.Ka.No.297/A1/209, dated 08.07.2019 has also stated that the

¶38

petitioner has reported for training for

¶39

90 days. He will be on training for 3

¶40

months from 08.07.2019 to 22.11.2019. Hence, it is further submitted that the

¶41

orders of the Hon'ble Court has been duly

¶42

complied with.”

¶43

The proceedings of the Principal of DIET,

¶44

Krishnagiri, has also been produced to show that the

¶45

petitioner has in fact joined training yesterday. Recording https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

the same, the Contempt Petition is closed. The presence

¶47

of the Contemnor is dispensed with. In view of the order passed in the Contempt Petition, the connected Sub Application is also closed.

¶48

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶49

¶50

//Certified to be true copy//

¶51

Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.

¶52

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶53

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶54

Mv/01/08/2019

¶55

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.S. Saravanan v. Tmt. Mageswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.S. Saravanan v. Tmt. Mageswari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Parveen Jaleela W/O.a.Noordeen Vs Mr.Shanavazz Mohamed S/O.Mohamed Haneef

Divya Davloor Vs Harshavardan Davloor

M.M.Sajitha Fathima Vs G.M.Pens International Pvt. Ltd.

G. Srinivas Vs Mr M Swaminathan

G.Munawarkhan Vs Azharudeen H.

Mr.Harish Raghavan and 2 Others Vs Mercado Online Private Ltd. and Another