K.Ganesan v. K.Pandi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The petitioner did not appear, and the Court held there was no violation of the impugned order.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.1861 of 2017
K.Ganesan .. Petitioner -vs1. Mr.K.Pandy Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited Salem Division No.12, Ramakrishna Road Post Box No.713 Salem 636 007 2. Mr.V.Shanmugasundaram General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Salem Division No.12, Ramakrishna Road Post Box No.713 Salem 636 007 3. Mr.Muniyappan Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust Thiruvalluvar House Pallavan Salai Chennai 600 002 .. Respondents Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 4.4.2016 made in W.P.No.12615 of 2016.
2
For Petitioner :: No appearance For Respondents :: Ms.S.Rajini Ramadoss Standing Counsel
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed wilful disobedience of the order dated 4.4.2016 in W.P.No.12615 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Ganesan
- respondent
Mr. K. Pandy
- respondent
Mr. V. Shanmugasundaram
- respondent
Mr. Muniyappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court