Meenakshi v. Pandi
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order dismissing a contempt petition. The court accepted the prosecution's submission that the underlying complaint was closed due to lack of willful disobedience, resulting in no punishment for the respondent.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed; liberty granted to challenge the closure report.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.1232 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Cont.P.No.1232 of 2019
Meenakshi ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Pandi,
The Inspector of Police,
Thanipadi Police Station,
Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of the Courts Act praying to punish the respondent
for the non compliance of the order passed in
Crl.O.P.No.28902 of 2017 dated 10.01.2018
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mariappan
For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Heard Mr.M.Mariappan, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the respondent.
1
Cont.P.No.1232 of 2019
consideration, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions, submitted that the petitioner's complaint has been closed in Crime No.117 of 2014
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meenakshi
- respondent
Mr. Pandi
Coram
M.S. Ramesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court