Contempt petition to punish respondent for disobeying an earlier order. Court recorded that the 3rd respondent had considered the petitioner's representation, ordered the contempt petition to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1023 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 03.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
CONT.P.No.1023 of 2019
R.Abitha Begum .. Petitioner
Versus
Mr.Anbu Selvan, The District Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. .. Respondent
Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act,1971, to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 23.10.2018 passed in W.P.No.26988 of 2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghupathi For Respondent : Mr.D.Raja, AGP
ORDER
Pursuant to the direction of this Court passed in W.P.No.26988 of 2018 dated 23.10.2018, the 3rd respondent has considered the representation of the petitioner and has passed order vide proceedings dated 30.09.2019.
1/2
Cont.P.No.1023 of 2019
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rpl
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
Smi/21/10/2019
To
The District Collector,
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.
2/2
R. Abitha Begum
Mr. Anbu Selvan
Dr. Justice G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
