Sivan v. Krishnammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought condonation of delay for a Review Application. Counsel moved to withdraw the petition, which the court allowed by dismissing it as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Permission granted for withdrawal of proceedings.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CMP(MD) No.6555 of 2018 IN REV.APLC(MD) No.SR23549 of 2018
- 1 SIVAN
- 2 BALASHANMUGAM
- 3 MURUGAN
- 4 MUTHURAKKU 5 SUNDARAVALLI 6 PANCHAVARNAM (DIED) ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
1 KRISHNAMMAL 2 SARATHAMANIAMMAL 3 S.P.KASI 4 A.VISALAKSHI 5 AANDISAMY 6 GANAPATHY 7 MINOR SELVI REP.BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN A.VISALAKSHI, 4TH RESPONDENT HEREIN 8 BALASHANMUGAM 9 RAMACHANDRAN 10 KOTHAIAMMAL 11 PUSHPA RAJAMANI 12 A.MOHAN 13 LAKSHMI 14 MALLIGA 15 MUTHURAKKU 16 SOORIYAGANTHI, 17 RATHEEAMMAL, (DIED) 18 ANNAMALAI 19 SIVALINGAM 20 MUTHURAMALINGAM ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SIVAN
- respondent
BALASHANMUGAM
Coram
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court