Allowed

The Managing Director v. D.Ponraj

Madras HC20 Dec 2019CMP(MD)/12496/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition seeks condonation of a 154-day delay in filing a first appeal under C.M.A.(MD) No.SR20262 of 2019. The court, finding reasons satisfactory and no objection from respondents, allowed the petition and condoned the delay upon payment of Rs.200/- to the District Siddha Medical Officer.

What did the court decide?

The delay of 154 days is condoned on condition that the petitioner pays Rs.200/- to the District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam by 06.01.2020.

The Managing Director Vs D.Ponraj — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.12496 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶6

CMP(MD) No.12496 of 2019 in C.M.A.(MD) No.SR20262 of 2019

¶7

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KUMBAKONAM LTD., PERIYAMILAGUPARAI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI- 001. ... PETITIONER/ APPELLANT

¶8

1 D.PONRAJ 2 CHANDRA 3 RAMANI DEVI

¶9

4 RANJANI DEVI

¶10

5 BALAMURUGAN ... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 154 days in re-presenting the above C.M.A.SR . No. 20262 of 2019 and thus render justice.

¶12

PRAYER IN C.M.A.(MD) No.SR20262 of 2019:

¶13

To set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Tiruchirappalli in M.C.O.P.No.1743 of 2015 dated 28.01.2019.

¶14

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.SIVARAMAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶15

Both side present.

¶16

2.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 154 days in representing the first appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.SR20262 of 2019.

¶17

3.The respondents side has no serious objection.

¶18

4.The reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition, are satisfactory, hence, this petition is allowed and, the

¶19

1/2

¶20

CMP(MD) No.12496 of 2019

¶21

delay is condoned on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.200/- (Rupees Two Hundred only) to the credit of the “District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam” (payable in Account No.10767823177, SBI, Periyakulam), on or before 06.01.2020.

¶22

sd/20/12/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

¶25

THE SPECIAL DISTRICT JUDGE, THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

¶26

COPY TO:

¶27

THE DISTRICT SIDDHA MEDICAL OFFICER, CCRI, PERIYAKULAM.

¶28

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.12496 of 2019 IN C.M.A.(MD) No.SR20262 of 2019 Date :20/12/2019 MS/JC/SAR-3/03.01.2020/2P.3C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

The Managing Director v. D.Ponraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. D.Ponraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fathima Gani Vs Hasarath Sayad Shaw Mian

P.K.Abdul Kader Vs P.a.Jannath Ganni

Malathi Vs the Managing Director

J.Gabrilla, D/O. John, Vs Amaladoss, S/O. Durairaj

S.Selvakumar Vs v.Arulpandi

Sri Erichavudayar Sadaivudayar Dharmasasha Thirukoil Vs P.Sundararajan