Pasupathi, v. R.v.S.Dhandapani
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought an order to replace an original document with a certified copy. The respondent had no objection, and the petition was allowed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The Registry is directed to return the original document marked as Ex.A8 by substituting a certified copy obtained from the Registrars office.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CMP(MD) No.11508 of 2018 IN SA(MD) No.751 of 2014
PASUPATHI ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
R.V.S.DHANDAPANI ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order to return the original document marked as exhibit A8 by substituting a certified copy obtained from the Registrars office in his place and pass such other suitable orders and thereby render justice.
Prayer in SA(MD). 751/2014 :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PASUPATHI
- respondent
R.V.S.DHANDAPANI
Coram
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court