M.Marudhachalam v. Mahendra T.Thakkar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought clarification of a previous order. The Court held that since the Advocate Commissioner required police aid, the proper remedy was to approach the learned single Judge, treating this petition as a distraction from the correct procedural route.
What did the court decide?
This petition stands closed as the proper remedy to seek police aid is to approach the learned single Judge.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the First day of March Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN CMP NO.5490 OF 2019 IN OSA.NO.14 OF 2019 M.MARUDHACHALAM [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 MAHENDRA T.THAKKAR [ RESPONDENT ] TRADDING AS PRAKASH TRADING CO., PILLAIYARKARISALKULAM, INAMKARISALKULAM POST, SRIVILLIPUTHUR-626125 ALSO AT JALARAM PARKCHALI NO.1, JASKA ROAD, HARIJ-384 240 GUJARAJ
2 TRIBHUVANDAS V.THAKKAR TRADING AS PRAKASHKUMAR TRIBHUVANDAS, JALARAM PARKCHALI, NO.1, JASKA ROAD, HARIJ-384240 GUJARAT
3 N.RANGA RAO AND SONS PVT. LTD., P.B.NO.52, VANI VILAS ROAD, MYSORE 570004 AND WHOSE BRANCH OFFICER IS AT T.S.109, BLOCK NO.3, POOMAGAL 5TH STREET EKKATHUTHANGAL, CHENNAI-600097
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to clarify the order dated 11.1.2019 passed by this Hon`ble Court in the above O.S.A.Nos.14 and 15 of 2019 (in CMP.5490/19) and OSA.NO.14/19.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.M.MARUDHACHALAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.BALACHANDRAN AdvOCATE for 1 & 2 respodnents https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and M/S.RAJESH RAMANATHAN Advocate for 3rd respondent the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.MARUDHACHALAM
- respondent
MAHENDRA T.THAKKAR
- respondent
TRIBHUVANDAS V.THAKKAR
- respondent
N.RANGA RAO AND SONS PVT. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court