Periyanayagam, v. Vellaisamy @ Anthonimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
431 of 2011 in S.A.No.396 of 2002 TRNJ…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.429, 430 and 431 of 2011 in S.A.No.396 of 2002
TRNJ
Mr.R.Vasudevan undertakes to file Vakalat to the proposed respondents.
Both Counsel present and heard. No objection put forth for entertaining the application to bring the legal heirs of the deceased R6 on record. Considering the reasons given in the affidavit appended to the petition they being acceptable and in the interest of the justice. Petitions are ordered.
Registry is directed to amend the appeal memorandum accordingly and post the appeal on 16.04.2019.
11.04.2019
bga/rl
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court