S.Pachamuthu v. S.Annadurai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition and rejected the associated Civil Revision Petition, ruling that the third respondent was not a necessary party to the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed; no costs awarded; Civil Revolution Petition rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :19.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.M.P.No.4028 of 2019
in
C.R.P.SR.No.137566 of 2018
1.S.Pachmuthu
2.M.Palanisamy ... Petitioners
-vs-
1.S.Annadurai
2.Thangavel
3.The Sub-Registrar,
Sub-Registrar Office,
Mecheri, Salem District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, to accept the cause title of the present Civil Revision Petition of the District Munsif Court, Mettur dated 07.02.2019 in I.A.No.573 of 2018 in O.S.No.111 of 2018.
For Petitioners : Mr.Law Vision *****
ORDER
The interlocutory application, against which the present
revision petition has been filed , is against one Annadurai,
Thangavel and the third respondent is not a party to the proceedings, since no orders were sought against the third
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the Civil Miscellaneous Petition to accept the cause title of the underlying revision petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Pachmuthu
- petitioner
M.Palanisamy
- respondent
S.Annadurai
- respondent
Thangavel
- respondent
The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Mecheri, Salem District.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court