The Court allowed a petition to condone a 67-day delay in filing an appeal (CM.P.No.20284 of 2019 in W.A.No.sr60972 of 2019). Satisfied with the reasons in the affidavit and after hearing counsel, the delay was condoned and the petition was disposed of as prayed.
Delay of 67 days in filing the appeal was condoned and the petition was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.20284 of 2019 in W.A.No.sr60972 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.Kirubakaran, J)
This is a petition to condone the delay of 67 days in filing the above appeal.
2.Heard Mr.J.Pothiraj, learned Special Government Pleader/R1 Mr.Rameshwar, learned standing counsel for TANGEDCO/R2 and Mr.Arunkumar, learned counsel for R3.
3.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above petition and after hearing the learned counsel appearing on both sides, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.
(NKKJ) (PVJ)
17.10.2019
sai Note: Office is directed to number the appeal, if it is in order, and print the name of Mr.J.Pothiraj, learned Special Government Pleader for R1, Mr.Rameshwar, learned counsel for R2 and Mr.Arunkumar, as learned counsel for R3
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 67 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Whether the reasons stated in the affidavit are sufficient to justify condonation of delay.
N. KIRUBAKARAN
P. VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
