Dismissed

The Executive Officer v. Ayyasamy

Madras HC30 Oct 2019CMP/13709/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil miscellaneous petition, the appellant sought condonation of a 1348-day delay in filing a second appeal, attributing the delay to the inability of government counsel to provide judgment copies within three and a half years. The court rejected the claim, holding that the delay was unreasonably long and unsupported by sufficient cause, distinguishing the precedent cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

The Executive Officer Vs Ayyasamy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 30.10.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶5

C.M.P.No. 13709 of 2019 in S.A.S.R.No. 48920 of 2019

¶6

The Executive Officer, Selection Grade Panchayat, Kodavasal, Represented by its Executive Officer Having office at Koradacheri Main Road, Kodavasal Town, Nannilam Munsif. ..Appellant/Defendant Vs. Ayysamy ..Respondent/Plaintiff

¶7

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed praying to condone the delay of 1348 days filing second Appeal to set aside the Judgements and Decree passed in A.S.No. 12 of 2014 dated 26.03.2015 by the Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur. Confirming the Decree and Judgment passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Nannilam, dated 11/09/2012 made in O.S.No. 75/2011.

¶8

For Appellant : Mr.G.Muthurasu For Respondent : D.Veerasekaran J U D G M E N T

¶9

This application has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1348 days in preferring the appeal against the Judgement and decree dated 26.03.2015, made in A.S.No. 12 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur. The reasons given for the delay in the affidavit filed in support of this petition are as follows;

¶10

“The Appellant respectfully submits that the Hon'ble first Appellate Court passed the judgement and decree 26.03.2015 and, subsequently the Appellant approached the first Appellate Court government counsel several times for getting the copy of said judgement and decree. But the first Appellate Court government counsel did not give the said copy of said judgement and decree to Appellant. Finally, only on 19.09.2018 copy application made and obtained the copy of Judgement and decree on

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

24.04.2018. Due the administrative reasons the Appellate did not file this second Appeal within time. Hence, the Appellant filing this second Appeal is neither wilful nor wanton but for the bonafide reasons stated in the above. The Appellant therefore file this petition for condone delay before this Hon'ble Court.”

¶13

The Judgement of the Lower Appellate Court was pronounced on 26.03.2015 and the copy application itself was made only on 19.09.2018, nearly after 3 years and 6 months. The delay is attributed to the counsel in applying for a copy after 3 years and 6 months.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would rely upon Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the state of Manipur & Ors Vs Koting Lamkang in Civil Appeal No. 8298 of 2019, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that regard should be had, in similar circumstances, to the impersonal nature of the Government's functioning where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. In the case on hand, though the delay is unreasonably long, the affidavit is totally silent as to the action taken by the officers of the appellant to pursue the appeal. Even the copy application has been filed 3 ½ years after the disposal of the appeal. I am therefore unable to pursuade myself to conclude that the appellant has made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay.

¶15

kmm To:1.The Subordinate Judge, Thiruvarur.

¶16

2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam, Thiruvarur District. +1cc to Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Advocate, S.R.No. 89824

¶17

C.M.P.No. 13709 of 2019 in S.A.S.R.No. 48920 of 2019

¶18

EV(CO) GN(13/12/2019)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Executive Officer v. Ayyasamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

The Executive Officer v. Ayyasamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Thirugnanasampanthan Vs S.Perumal

Govindan Vs Revathi

Shanthi Vs Minor Gobika

Vasu@Anbalagan Naicker Vs Veeramani

M/S.Icicibank Vs M/S.Gayathri Exports

V.K.Shanumugam Vs K.Murugesan