Kaliswamy v. Smt.Rathnam
Case brief
What is this about?
Respondents sought to recall an order imposing costs on them. The court noted the petitioners had already paid the costs and the claim was satisfied, dismissing the petition as nothing remained.
What did the court decide?
Order closed as nothing survives due to prior payment of costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM
CMP No.11412 of 2019
IN SA.NO.1567 OF 2002
NAJNAMMAL (DECD)
1 KALISWAMY [ PETITIONERS ]
2 P. SELLAKUTTY
Vs
1 SMT.RATHNAM [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 NANJAMMAL (DIED).
3 POOVATHAL
4 DHANALAKSHMI
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to recall the order dated 08-01-2019 passed by this Honourable Court and impose heave costs on the appellant IN CMP.NO.11412 OF 2019.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.S. KARTHIK RAJA, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.P.MUTHUSWAMY, (P-IN-P) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed by the respondents 2 and 3 to re-call the order passed by this court dated 08.01.2019.
- This Court by the order dated 08.01.2019 has directed the respondents 2 and 3/petitioners herein to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/as costs to the appellant. Now, it is represented that the petitioners herein have already complied with the said order and Rs.5,000/- was paid to the appellants.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kaliswamy
- petitioner
P. Sellakutty
- petitioner
Nanjammal (Died)
- respondent
Smt. Rathnam
- respondent
Dhanalakshmi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court