8.On perusal of the records, it is seen that the appellant claimed her monthly income at Rs.8,000/- per month by stating that she was working as a tailor. The appellant/claimant was aged 18 years and considering the date of accident in the absence of any proof the income assessed by the Tribunal at Rs.3,000/- per month is very much reasonable. While verifying the loss of earning, the Tribunal has assessed the discharge summary, in which it has been categorically stated that the appellant/claimant was under treatment for nearly 21 days. For the first time she was admitted into hospital on 24.04.2009 and discharged on 28.04.2009. For the second time she was admitted into hospital on 28.04.2009 and discharged on 13.05.2009. Hence, the Tribunal by relying upon the said statements has awarded loss of income for two months during the treatment period. It is seen that the appellant/claimant sustained right humerus Grade III Medical epicondyle fracture, right arm traumatic laceration, internal degloving injury involving right arm and proximal right fore arm, right ulnar nerve contusion, right radial head fracture. In view of the said injuries, this Court is of the view that the loss of income assessed by the Tribunal for two months has to be modified to three months i.e. (Rs.3,000/- x 3) Rs.9,000/-. Similarly, it is seen that the claimant was admitted in the hospital twice and she was also treated surgically which
