M. Munusamy v. S. Thangam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as withdrawn upon the appellant's counsel seeking permission and filing an endorsement to that effect.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
C.M.A.No.2708 of 2009
M.Munusamy ... Appellant
..Vs..
1.S.Thangam
2.The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.45/146, Moore Street, Motor Third Party Cell, Chennai -1. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the decree and Judgment dated 31.12.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.590 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / III Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.A.Shanmugaraj For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Babu for R2 No appearance for R1 J U D G M E N T
No appearance for R1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Munusamy
- respondent
S. Thangam
- respondent
The New India Assurance Company Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court