8.On hearing both sides and on perusing the available records, it is seen that when the deceased was travelling in the said two wheeler on 19.08.2016, a bus came behind the said two wheeler in a rash and negligent manner and a student who travelled on the foot board of the bus touched the said two wheeler, as a result of which, the deceased lost his balance, fell down and caused the accident. Hence, the appellant is very much aggrieved by stating that the negligence aspect was on the part of the driver of the bus who permitted more number of passengers to travel in the foot board, which resulted the said accident. Hence, the liability fixed by the Tribunal is very much aggrieved by the Transport corporation. It is seen from records that the Tribunal has taken into consideration the evidence of PW2, eyewitness who deposed before the Tribunal that the place of occurrence is not at the bus stop and the bus was proceeding behind the two wheeler and the student travelled in the said bus was in the foot board, hit the two wheeler, hence the deceased fell down on the road. Further, Ex.P1/ First Information Report filed only against the driver of the bus, which is very much observed by the Tribunal. Hence, the observations made by the Tribunal by fixing the negligence on the part of the driver is very much reasonable.
