R. Kalimuthu v. M/S.P.Sakthivel
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant failed to appear despite prior directions to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for non-prosecution. The High Court dismissed the appeal accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed; no cost.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
R.Kalimuthu ... Appellant
vs
1.P.Sakthivel
2.Pandian ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, against the order made in W.C.No.62 of 2001, dated 31.10.2003, on the file of the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Salem (Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Salem-7).
For Appellant : No appearance
When this case was called on 17.10.2019, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, this case was directed to be listed on 21.10.2019 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Thereafter, 24.10.2019 (today) this case was listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2.Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Kalimuthu
- respondent
P. Sakthivel
- respondent
Pandian
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court