Disposed

The Managing Director v. Sambandammal

Madras HC9 Mar 2019CMA/1620/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Lok Adalat award settling a civil miscellaneous appeal arising from a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal judgment. The parties reached a compromise regarding the settlement amount and interest, leading to the disposal of the appeal without a formal trial on the issue.

What did the court decide?

Settlement awarded; appellant to deposit balance within twelve weeks; cheques to be issued by Tribunal without formal petition; appeal disposed of.

The Managing Director Vs Sambandammal — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 9th day of March, 2019

¶3

LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided over by

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and

¶7

Members

¶8

Mrs.P.Kavitha Balakrishnan Mr.Daniel Haridoss

¶9

C.M.A.No.1620 of 2016

¶10

[Appeal against the judgment and decree passed on 03.11.2015 in MCOP.No.91 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims and Tribunal, Krishnagiri.] Executive Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Division, Villupuram. ... Appellant Vs. 1. Samanthammal 2. Govindaraj 3. Minor Logesh kumar 4. Ammayammal ... Respondents

¶11

Though the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is not listed today. It was taken up for settlement before this Lok Adalat sitting at the request of the counsel. Both the parties are present. The learned counsel for the appellant K.J.Sivakumar and the second respondent Mr.J.Govindaraj are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties have arrived at a compromise to settle the case as follows:

¶12

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶13

By an award dated 03.11.2015, the Tribunal has awarded sum of Rs.11,25,000 to the claimants.

¶14

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶15

¶16

2.The award amount has been deposited together with interest and is currently lying in the account of M.C.O.P.No.91 of 2015.

¶17

3.The second respondent has agreed to receive the sum of Rs.13,00,000 in full quit together with interest accrued in the account.

¶18

4.The appellant/Transport Corporation has agreed to deposit the balance amount, less the amount already deposited within a period of twelve weeks from today. The claimants/respondents are permitted to withdraw the entire amount, in the same ratio as apportioned by the Tribunal without filing any formal petition. The Award is passed accordingly.

¶19

5.The Tribunal is directed to issue the cheque to the parties concerned on proper identification in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly if any.

¶20

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Division, Villupuram.

¶21

Counsel for the Appellant

Vs.

Samanthammal

Govindaraj

http://www.judis.nic.in

Minor Logesh kumar

Ammayammal

Counsel for the respondents

¶30

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶31

The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner
provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of
Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
Judge
Member Member
To:The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
1.The Motor Accidents Claims and Tribunal, Krishnagiri.

¶32

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶33

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶34

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.

¶35

jen

¶36

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.SARAVANAN, J.,

jen

C.M.A.No.1620 of 2016

¶41

09.03.2019

¶42

http://www.judis.nic.in

The Managing Director v. Sambandammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. Sambandammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Vs Kaliamurthy

M/S Bhareth Formulations Pvt. Vs M/S Sriram Pharma

Syed Mazheruddin Vs Dr. Govindarajan Venkatesh

The Managing Director Vs Murugan

Metropolitan Transport Vs K.Muthupandi

Metropolitan Transport Vs K.Premraj