6.The Tribunal has awarded Rs.5,000/- towards transport expenses and extra nourishment, Rs.5,000/- towards medical expenses, Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.10,000/towards permanent disability, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of earning capacity and Rs.10,000/- towards loss of income during treatment period, totalling to Rs.50,000/- in all. The claimant herself examined as P.W.1 and she deposed that in the accident, she had sustained fracture of right wrist and left collar bone and also contusion in left ankle; she was taken treatment from 16.02.2000 to 10.03.2000 in the Government Royapettah Hospital as inpatient; and she was 30 years and was earning Rs.90/- per day by working as Coolie in building construction. The evidence of the claimant relating to income and avocation was corroborated by her husband, who was examined as P.W.2. The doctor, who treated the claimant, was examined as P.W.3. Ex.P1 is the discharge summary; Exs.P4 -photo and P6-X Ray are pertaining to the injuries suffered by the claimant; and Ex.P5 is the disability certificate, as per which, the claimant sustained 40% permanent disability. Considering those oral and documentary evidence adduced, this Court is of the opinion that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is very low and disproportionate to the gravity of injuries sustained by the claimant and hence, the same needs to be enhanced. Accordingly, it would be just and proper to award a sum of Rs.60,000/towards permanent disability, at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per percentage of disability, Rs.10,000/- towards transport expenses and extra nourishment, Rs.10,000/- towards medical expenses, Rs.30,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.15,000/- towards loss of income during treatment period. In view of enhancing the award under the head “permanent disability” to Rs.60,000/-, the
