Dismissed

E.Sivagami v. M/S Neel Metal Fanlca

Madras HC9 Mar 2019CMA/1281/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat settled a civil miscellaneous appeal against an Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award. The insurer agreed to deposit an additional sum as full settlement, which the court directed to be transferred to the appellant.

What did the court decide?

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. directed to deposit Rs. 25,000 as full settlement and transfer the amount to the appellant's bank account via NEFT/RTGS.

E.Sivagami Vs M/S Neel Metal Fanlca — Insurance | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

Organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 09^th day of March, 2019 LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided by

¶6

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶7

and
Members:
Mr.T. Sankara Narayanan Pillai
Mr.Tranqubar Dorai Vasu
C.M.A.No.1281 of 2013
This Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated
12.12.2012 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.4200 of 2008 on the file of the
Chief Judge, Small Causes Court (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal),
Chennai.
E.Sivagami ...Appellant
Vs.
1.M/s.Neel Metal Fanlca Environment
Management Pvt. Ltd.,
No.1868, II Block, 26 th Street,
Anna Nagar West,
Chennai – 600 040.
[1 st Respondent remained ex-parte]
2.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Divisional Office 3,
No.58, Purasawalkam High Road,
Purasawalkam,
Chennai. ...Respondents

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

¶10

This case is taken up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. The learned for the appellant Mr.R.Kalai Arasan and the learned counsel for the respondents Mr.S.Arun Kumar are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶11

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶12

The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.12.2012 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.4200 of 2008 on the file of the Chief Judge, Small Causes Court (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal), Chennai to enhance the compensation.

¶13

2.It is represented by the insurance company that the Insurance company has accepted to deposit further a sum of Rs.25,000/- as full quit. Both the parties have agreed for the same.

¶14

3.The Insurance Company is directed to deposit a further sum of Rs.25,000/- as full quit, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

4.The Tribunal is directed to transfer the above said modified award amount to the individual bank account of the appellants by way of NEFT/RTGS, on proper identification in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition.

¶16

5.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

¶17

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

¶19

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶20

The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶21

E.Sivagami ... Counsel for the Appellant
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Divisional Office 3,
No.58, Purasawalkam High Road,
Purasawalkam,
Chennai. ... Counsel for the 2 nd Respondent
Judge
Member Member
To
The parties/Counsel concerned
Copy to

¶22

1.The Motors Accidents Claims Tribunal,

¶23

In the III Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

¶24

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶25

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶26

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶28

¶29

M.NIRMAL KUMAR.J,

¶30

¶31

C.M.A.No.1281 of 2013

¶32

09.03.2019

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

E.Sivagami v. M/S Neel Metal Fanlca

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Sivagami v. M/S Neel Metal Fanlca

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Mannar Vs the Sub Divisional Executive

S.Ganesan Vs K.Thirupathy

V.Israel Vs the Commissioner of Police

S.Kasthuri Vs G.Panneer Selvam

G.Ramesh Vs G.Panner Selvam

E.Sivagami Vs M/S Neel Metal Fanlca