R. Arun v. K. Nandagopal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for non-appearance by the appellant, treating the appeal as one for dismissal due to default.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
CMA.No.1161 of 2014
R.Arun ...Appellant/Petitioner
vs.
1.K.Nandagopal
2.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.4, Muthulinga Reddy Street, West Tambaram, Near Police Station, Chennai - 45. 3.B.Suresh (1st and 3rd Respondent in Lower Court and Notice may be dispensed with)
4.The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., No.196/1B, N.S.K.Salai, Vadapalani, Chennai - 26. ...Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the decree and Judgment dated 26.06.2012 passed in MCOP.No.1990 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / VI Judge, Court of small Causes, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RArun
- respondent
K.Nandagopal
- respondent
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
- respondent
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court