Disposed

Janardhanan v. P Chandrasekaran

Madras HC19 Jun 2019CMA/1130/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. On consent of parties, the appeal was disposed of by directing the insurance respondent to deposit Rs. 20,000 with interest, and the case was remanded to the Tribunal for payment to the now-major appellant.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of; the second respondent is directed to deposit Rs. 20,000 with interest at 7.5% p.a. The Tribunal is directed to transfer the amount to the appellant's account upon applicati

Janardhanan Vs P Chandrasekaran — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 19.06.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

C.M.A.NO.1130 OF 2005

¶6

Janardhanan (Minor Rep. by his mother and

¶7

next friend Mageswari) .. Appellant/Petitioner

¶8

Vs.
1. P.Chandrasekaran
(R1 set exparte before the Tribunal)
2. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
38, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.
.. Respondents/Respondents
Prayer:
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173
of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree
dated 05.11.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.4860 of 1999, on the file of
the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (III Judge, Court of Small
Causes) at Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.A.N.Viswanatha Rao
For R2 : Mr.D.Baskaran
JUDGMENT

¶9

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.11.2004 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (III Judge, Court of Small Causes) at Chennai, in M.C.O.P.No.4860 of 1999, whereby, the claims Tribunal has dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellant, claiming a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that had occurred on 29.05.1999, on account of the vehicle belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent insurance company.

¶10

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the second respondent insurance company, on

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

instructions, submitted that the second respondent insurance company agreed to pay a compensation of Rs.20,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of this appeal, taking note of the quantum of permanent disability sustained and the period of treatment undertaken by the appellant/claimant. The same has also been agreed upon by the learned counsel for the appellant/claimant.

¶13

Recording the said submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to award the compensation of Rs.20,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of this appeal and this appeal is accordingly disposed of. The second respondent insurance company is directed to deposit the said amount within a period of four week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is reported that the appellant has attained majority as of now. In view of the same, the Tribunal shall transfer the amount lying in the deposit to the savings bank account of the appellant through RTGS, on making proper application. No costs.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
av
To
1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
The III Court of Small Causes,
Chennai.
2. The Section Officer,
VR Section, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.D.Baskaran, Advocate, S.R.No.49826
C.M.A.No.1130 of 2005
CA(CO)
CS/08/10/2020

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Janardhanan v. P Chandrasekaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardhanan v. P Chandrasekaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Branch Manager Vs Muniappan

G. Vairavan Vs M. Ayyasamy

Venkateshappa Vs M/S Coramandal

1.BRANCH Manager, Vs K.Gopal

National Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs K.Semalaiappan,S/O.Karuppasamy

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs Pattu