R.Veeramani v. B.Maheshwari
Case brief
What is this about?
The First Appeal filed by R. Veeramani was dismissed as infructuous after the appellant's counsel withdrew the matter, resulting in no costs and closure of connected petitions.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.02.2019 Coram The Honourable Ms. Justice P.T.ASHA A.S.No.806 of 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2010
R.Veeramani ... Appellant
Versus
1.B.Maheswari
2.Shanmugam ... Respondents
(Notice to the 2 nd Respondent
is not necessary)
PRAYER: The First Appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1
r/w Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the
Judgment and Decree dated 23.06.2010 made in O.S.No.157 of
2008 on the file of the Additional District Court/Fast
Track Court No.3, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr. R. Vinothraja,
for M/s. N. Manokaran.
For Respondents : Mr. D.Shivakumaran for R1
Given up for R2
JUDGMENT
Today(01.02.2019), when the matter was called, the
learned counsel for the appellant has made an endorsement
to withdraw the appeal.
2.In view of the submission made by the Appellant's counsel, nothing survives in the above matter and therefore, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS iii)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jrs
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Veeramani
- respondent
1. B. Maheswari
- respondent
2. Shanmugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court