N. Sivakami v. Nallathal(Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the first appeal as having been withdrawn by the appellants with the permission of the court.
What did the court decide?
The first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.06.2019 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN A.S.No.353 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.13322 of 2017
- N.Sivakami
2. N.Sivasellamuthu
3.Maheswari
...Appellants/Defendants 3 to 5
Vs.
Nallathal (Died)
1. M.Saraswathi
2. Leelavathy
3.Padhmavathy
4.Rathinam
5.V.Amirthalaingam
... Respondents 1 to 5/Plaintiffs 2 to 6
6.Kaliammal
7.G.Sivakami .... Respondents 6 to 7/Defendants 1 & 2
Prayer: First Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1, r/w 96 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 18.01.2017 made in O.S.No.365 of 2013 on the file of the First Additional District Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellants : Mr.S.Mukunth
for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents : Mr.C.Veeraraghavan
J U D G M E N T
Both Counsel present.
2.Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the first appeal and also made an endorsement to that effect.
- In the light of the above position, the first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.Sivakami & Ors.
- respondent
M.Saraswathi & Ors.
Coram
T.Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court