Allowed

Pradeep Cholayil and another v. Karnataka Soaps and Detergent Limited

Madras HC2 Dec 2019A/9263/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras heard three applications seeking to file additional documents, reopen evidence, and recall a witness (PW-1) after cross-examination by the respondent. The respondent objected to the admissibility of certain documents, arguing for objections at the time of marking. The court allowed the applications with a direction to object to inadmissible documents during the marking pro

What did the court decide?

Applications A.Nos. 9263, 9264, and 9265 of 2019 allowed with direction to object to inadmissible documents at time of marking.

Pradeep Cholayil and another Vs Karnataka… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN TE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN A.NOS.9263, 9264 AND 9265 OF 2019

¶4

IN C.S.No.225 of 2018

¶5

Pradeep Cholayil, No.8, J Block, 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 600 102. rep by its constituted attorney Mr.Heeroon Rasheed M.S.

¶6

Cholayil Private Limited, No.8, J Block, 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 600 102. rep.by its Manager - Legal Mr.Heeroon Rasheed M.S. ..Applicants/Plaintiffs in A.NOS.9263, 9264 AND 9265 OF 2019

¶7

-VersusKarnataka Soaps and Detergent Limited P.B. 5531 Poona Highway, Bangalore, 560 055 Karnataka, India. ..Respondent/Defendant in A.NOS.9263, 9264 AND 9265 OF 2019

¶8

A.No.9263 of 2019:

¶9

This application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the plaintiffs to file additional

¶10

documents a list whereof is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure A in the Judges Summons.

¶11

A.No.9264 of 2019:

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ This application praying that this Hon'ble Court be

¶13

pleased to reopen the plaintiffs side evidence being PW1.

¶14

¶15

A.No.9265 of 2019:

¶16

This application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to re-call PW1, to be exmined in respect of the documents mentioned hereinabove, more fully given in the schedule in the Judges Summons.

¶17

These applications coming on this day before this

¶18

Court for hearing the court made the following order:

¶19

The application in A.No.9263 of 2019 has been filed to permit the plaintiffs to file additional documents a list whereof is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure A.

¶20

The Application in A.No.9264 of 2019 has been filed to reopen the plaintiff's side evidence being PW1.

¶21

filed to recall PW-1 to be examined in respect of the documents mentioned hereinabove more fully given in the schedule mentioned application.

¶22

4.In the course of the cross examination, certain

¶23

questions were put to the plaintiffs by the defendant's

¶24

counsel, which has now led to the filing of these applications to permit the plaintiffs to file additional documents, re-open and recall PW-1.

¶25

5.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ defendnat submits that he has certain objections regarding the documents sought to be introduced.

¶26

6.If there is any inadmissible document to be marked

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ by the plaintiff, the same shall be objected at the time of

¶28

marking the document. The Master shall consider the

¶29

¶30

objection and take the document on file, subject to proof and admissibility.

¶31

These applications are allowed with the above

¶32

direction.

¶33

Sd/-DR.G.J.J.
02.12.2019
//Certified to be a true copy//
Dated this the day of 2019.
Su/04.12.2019 COURT OFFICER
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of
the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pradeep Cholayil and another v. Karnataka Soaps and Detergent Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Cholayil and another v. Karnataka Soaps and Detergent Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.G.Jayakumar Vs The District Collector

P.Karthik Vs The Registar the University of

P.Bharath Vs The Registar the University of

Jai Rajendra Impex Private Ltd. Vs Shambhu Nath and Brothers

Nivaran Herbal Pvt. Ltd. Vs P. Vikuntam

Aqua Sub Engineering and another Vs Onkarpit Techno Pvt.Ltd.