Mahalakshmi v. v.Marimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed an application to set aside an ex parte order and posted the main original petition for disposal.
What did the court decide?
Application to set aside ex parte order allowed and O.P. posted.
What the court decided
/ 1 /
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
A.NO.8516 OF 2019
IN O.P.No.79 of 2018 In the matter of Guardian and Wards Act 1890 And In the matter of Minor M.Varshini and M.Harrishraj O.P.NO.79 OF 2018: V.MARIMUTHU S/o.Venkatesh No.25/7 IlaiazhavarKoil Street, West Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. ..Petitioner MAHALAKSHMI D/o.Ram No.33, G.R.Builders, Mosque Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015. ..Respondent A.No.8516 of 2019: MAHALAKSHMI D/o.Ram No.33, G.R.Builders, Mosque Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015. ..Applicant/Respondent -vsV.MARIMUTHU S/o.Venkatesh No.25/7 IlaiazhavarKoil Street, West Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. ..Respondent/Petitioner
Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the ex parte order which was passed on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 01/10/2019 in G.W.O.P.No.79 of 2018 pending on the file of
this Court pending disposal of the main O.P.
This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:
This application has been filed to set aside the order dated 01.10.2019 made in the above original petition.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MAHALAKSHMI
- respondent
V.MARIMUTHU
Coram
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court