M.Dhanalakshmi v. L.Pushpa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras allowed applications filed by plaintiffs seeking leave to file reply statements against the written statements of the first and second defendants. The respondents did not object to the plea.
What did the court decide?
Leave to file reply statements to the written statement of the 1st and 2nd Defendants was granted to the plaintiffs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
A.Nos.7755 AND 7756 of 2019
in C.S.NO.483 of 2016 1.Mrs.M.Dhanalakshmi, W/o.Mr.R.Murugesan, No.9/23, 2nd Madley Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. 2.Mrs.N.Gomathi W/o.Mr.R.Nandeswara, No.50, Peters Road, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.
3.Mrs.S.Srilekha, W/o.Mr.T.Sivakuamr, No.429/104, Kamaraj Street, 20 Feet Road, Salem-7. ..Applicants/Plaintiffs in all applications
Vs
1.Mrs.L.Pushpa, W/o.Mr.L.Lakshmanan, No.9/23, 2nd Madley Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.
2.Mr.L.Manikandan, S/o.Mr.L.Lakshmanan, No.9/23, 2nd Madley Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. Respondents/Defendants in all applications
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mrs. M. Dhanalakshmi and others
- respondent
Mrs. L. Pushpa and Mr. L. Manikandan
Coram
K. Kalyanasundaram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court