The single judge allowed an application to condone a 28-day delay in filing an original petition regarding labour unrest hindering access to records, directing the registry to number the petition.
The application for condonation of delay was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.6971 of 2019
A.No.6971 of 2019 in O.P.SR.No.95636 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
This application is filed to condone the delay of 28 days in filing
O.P.SR.No.95636 of 2019.
for the respondent.
affidavit, wherein, it is stated that on account of the labour unrest, the
applicant did not have access to the relevant information and records, so as to
file a petition.
made by both the learned counsel, I am of the view that the applicant has
made out sufficient cause to condone the delay.
Registry is directed to number the Original Petition if it is otherwise in order.
25.09.2019
ub
1/2
A.No.6971 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ub
A.No.6971 of 2019 in
O.P.SR.No.95636 of 2019
25.09.2019
2/2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
