Mr.J.Subash v. Mrs.J. Maneeswari and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
in TOS.No.36 of 2017 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.No.6093 of 2019 in TOS.No.36 of 2017
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.,
Considering the averments
made in the affidavit filed in support
of the application and the fact that
the counsel for the respondents has no
objection for the delay being
condoned, this application is allowed
and the delay of 595 days in paying the
deficit court fee is condoned.
22.08.2019
dsa
Coram
R.SUBRAMANIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court