The single-judge bench allowed an application to permit the applicant to file additional documents in C.S.No.164 of 2017 subject to proof and relevancy.
Permission granted to file additional documents subject to proof and relevancy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.5531 of 2019 in C.S.No.164 of 2017
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.,
This application has been filed to permit the Applicant/Defendant
to file the additional documents in C.S.No.164 of 2017.
2.Heard both sides. Perused the affidavit and petition. The
learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has stated that the
applicant may be permitted to file additional documents subject to proof and relevancy.
filed in support of this application, this application is allowed and the applicant is permitted to file the additional documents subject to proof and relevancy.
07.08.2019
arr
2
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
arr
Application No.5531 of 2019
in
C.S.No.164 of 2017
07.08.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is permitted to file additional documents in the civil suit.
Applicant
Respondents
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
