Short order accepting the applicant's submission that an award had already been passed. The High Court closed the application filed to appoint a receiver to seize a vehicle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.4394 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A.No.4394 of 2019
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, 'Dare House', No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys,
Chennai – 600 001. Represented by its Authorised Signatory ... Applicant Vs. Ajit Dash ... Respondent
Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV, Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Section 9 (ii) (a) (b) (c) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint employee of the applicant viz., Mr. Gyana Ranjan Dash, ARM as receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle, which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or his men, agents, servants from his premises or wherever found with police aid and break open of premises if necessary.
1/2
A.No.4394 of 2019
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
For Applicant : Mr. N. Santhosh Nagarajan
O R D E R
It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that
already award has been passed. In such view of the matter, it is for the applicant to enforce the Award as per law.
2/2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
Ajit Dash
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
