B.Jayaraj v. R.B.Vinoth
Case brief
What is this about?
An application to revoke leave to sue was dismissed as it was not pressed by the counsel for the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Application to revoke leave to sue dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
A.No.9065 of 2018 in A.No.355 of 2019 in C.S.No.826 of 2018 R.B.Vinoth, No.9, 3rd Floor, Somasundareswarar Koil Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014 ...Applicant/Applicant (A.No.9065 of 2018) -vs1.Mr.B.Jayaraj, Old No.19, New No.27, Bashith Street, Chengalpet 603 002 2.M/s. Global Arkitekts Private Limited, Represented by its authorised signatory Mr.K.Badri Narayan Choudry No.33, Ivth Floor, Rutland Tower, Shafe Mohammed Road, Greams Road Post, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006 ...Respondents/Respondents (A.No.9065 of 2018)
2
A.No.355 of 2019:
Mr.B.Jayaraj, Old No.19, New No.27, Bashith Street, Chengalpet 603 002 ...Applicant/1st Defendant
-vs-
Parties & counsel
- respondent
R.B.Vinoth
- applicant
Mr. B. Jayaraj
- respondent
M/s. Global Arkitekts Private Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court