S.Ranjeet v. Nirupa
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner father sought to make absolute an interim custody order granting visitation rights while he resides abroad. Both parties conceded the arrangement was working well. Court made the prior order absolute and disposed of the application.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 07.09.2018 made absolute; application disposed of.
What the court decided
1
A.No.283 of 2016 in
O.P.No.44 of 2016
R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.
This Application has been field by the petitioner/ father of the child
seeking interim custody.
- Upon hearing the parties, this court had on 07.09.2018 passed the following orders:
“The learned counsel for the Respondent on instruction, pursuant to the order passed on 21.08.2018, has filed a memo stating that whenever the petitioner/ Husband who is currently in Dubai, visits India and comes down to Chennai, the Respondent/Wife agrees for his visiting the minor child at her residence after prior intimation to her. It is further agreed that when the petitioner/Husband makes request when he is in Bangalore where his mother resides, if prior intimation is given, without disturbing the child's education, the Respondent/Wife shall accompany the minor child to Bangalore at the expenses to be borne by the Petitioner/Husband. The aforesaid arrangement providing for visiting rights to the Petitioner/Husband shall continue until further orders. ”
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim custody order regarding visitation rights of the father should be made absolute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner/Father
- respondent
Respondent/Wife
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court