The judgment dismisses an application by the child's father to modify visitation orders. The court notes the child's recorded disinclination to meet the applicant and finds no grounds for modification of the existing directive.
The application for modification of the visitation order is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.2600 of 2017 in OP No.749 of 2009
R.SUBRAMANIAN.J.,
The applicant who is the father of
the child seeks modification of the
order dated 16.04.2010, in Application
Nos. 6948 and 6949 of 2009 to shift the
place of visit from Nadar Sangam,
T.V.K. Nagar to the Child Care Centre
attached to the Family Court at
Chennai. In view of the order passed in
Contempt Petition No.605 of 2019,
wherein I have recorded the
disinclination of the child to meet the
father, I do not think any modification is
required. Hence this application is
dismissed.
16.04.2019
j v 2/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether modification of custody visitation order is necessary considering the child's expressed disinclination to meet the father.
The applicant, the child's father, sought modification of custody visitation orders to shift the location of visits.
applicant
child
R.SUBRAMANIAN.J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
