Disposed

M.Balakrishnan, v. the Commissioner(Land Survey)

Madras HC26 Apr 2018WP(MD)/9498/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought issuance of F.M.B. Sketches for ancestral property. Court noted unsatisfactory documents were previously furnished. Directed fourth respondent to dispose of petitioner's specific representation with regard to the matter within eight weeks. Petition dismissed with this interim direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the fourth respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 13.04.2018 on merits within eight weeks after giving due opportunity.

M.Balakrishnan, Vs the Commissioner(Land Survey) — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.9498 of 2018 and

¶5

W.M.P.(MD) No.8750 of 2018

¶6

N.Balakrishnan ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The Commissioner (Land Survey)

¶9

O/o.The Central Land Survey Department

¶10

Chepauk, Chennai-600 005

¶11

The Assistant Director (Land Survey) O/o.the Central Land Survey Department

¶12

Chepauk, Chennai-600 005

¶13

The Assistant Commissioner (Land Survey) O/o.The Archives and Historical Research

¶14

No.51, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore

¶15

Chennai-600 008

¶16

The Joint Director (Land Survey) O/o.The Central Land Survey Department Chepauk, Chennai-600 005

¶17

The Assistant Director (Land Survey) / Personal Assistant to District Collector O/o.The District Land Survey Sivagangai District ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fifth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.A1/6488/2017, dated 01.02.2018 and quash the same as illegal, arbitray and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the respondents to issue old FMB Sketches to the petitioner's ancestral property situated at SF.No.1/16 (Village 1/16, Mahaani), Kayangulam Group 84, Kuttithinni Village, Thambanusilangulam Sub Division, Sivagangai District based on the representation of the petitioner dated 13.04.2018 within a stipulated time.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Kadhar For Respondents : Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Additional Government Pleader

¶20

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.

¶23

2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶24

3. When the petitioner had requested for issuance of F.M.B.Sketch and also filed a writ petition and contempt petition in this regard, by an order dated 01.02.2018, the required documents were furnished to the petitioner. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that the documents that were furnished to him are irrelevant and not connected with the requisition made by him. In this connection, he had made another representation, dated 13.04.2018 to the respondents.

¶25

4. Today (i.e.26.04.2018), when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representation, dated 13.04.2018, is directed to be disposed of by the fourth respondent at the earliest.

¶26

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, there will be a direction to the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 13.04.2018, on its own merits and take further action in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the persons, who may be interested in the subject matter.

¶27

6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶30

/True Copy/

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

To:

¶33

The Commissioner (Land Survey), O/o.The Central Land Survey Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶34

The Assistant Director (Land Survey), https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O/o.the Central Land Survey Department,

¶35

Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶36

¶37

The Assistant Commissioner (Land Survey), O/o.The Archives and Historical Research, No.51, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

¶38

The Joint Director (Land Survey), O/o.The Central Land Survey Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶39

The Assistant Director (Land Survey) / Personal Assistant to District Collector, O/o.The District Land Survey, Sivagangai District.

¶40

+1cc to Mr.S.Mohamed Kadhar, Advocate Sr.No.63539

¶41

KRK

¶42

VB/RSK/SAR4/08/05/2018/3P/7C

¶43

W.P.(MD) No.9498 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8750 of 2018 26.04.2018

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Balakrishnan, v. the Commissioner(Land Survey)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Balakrishnan, v. the Commissioner(Land Survey)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.K.Akbar Ali, Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative

V.Srinivasan, S/O.Virumandi, Vs the Regional Passport

Kaliyappan, Vs the District Collector

M.Suresh, S/O.Sundar Raj, Vs the Sub Registrar

S.Josphin Vanitha Rani, Vs the Joint Director of

V.Janakiraman, Vs the District Revenue Officer