R.Kamuthai, v. the Director
Case brief
What is this about?
No facts were pronounced as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.03.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.(MD)No.8808 of 2013
R.Kamuthai
... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Director, Local Fund & Audit Office, 4th Floor, Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 018.
- Veerapandi Town Panchayat, Through its Executive Officer, Theni District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent under Na.Ka.No.31704/Pay.O.Va(5)/2009, dated 16.05.2012 and to quash the same as it is illegal and in consequence to direct the first respondent to pay the arrears of pension to the petitioner on and from 10.01.2005 with appropriate interest within the time to be fixed by this Court and also to pay the monthly pension thereafter as accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Kamuthai
- respondent
The Director, Local Fund & Audit Office
- respondent
Veerapandi Town Panchayat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court