The Madurai Bench directed the first respondent, the Revenue Department, to dispose of a pending revenue revision petition filed by the petitioner within the specified period of 31.12.2018, instead of directing the restoration of demolished structures.
Direction to the first respondent to dispose of the petition on or before 31.12.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.11.2018
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
W.P.[MD].No.8432 of 2018
N.Kumarasamy : Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
5.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
6.Karuppaiah : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 to restore the sunshade of the petitioner house and that of the bore well in Survey No.115/19, Devapattu Village, which was demolished and dismantled respectively pending disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner before the first respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Devaraj
For R-1 to R-5 : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader For R-6 : Mr.K.N.Govardhanan
2
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.]
This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 to restore the sunshade of the petitioner's house and that of the bore well in Survey No.115/19, Devapattu Village, which was demolished and dismantled respectively, pending disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner before the first respondent.
3.Accordingly, the first respondent is directed to dispose the revision petition on or before 31.12.2018.
4.With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AS)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
am To
1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
4.The Tahsildar, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
3
5.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
+1cc to The Spl. Government Pleader, SR No.95408
W.P(MD)No.8432 of 2018
NM /RP/SAR II/16.11.18/3P/7C.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to restore the sunshade and borewell pending the disposal of a pending revision petition.
Whether the appropriate remedy is to direct the first respondent to dispose of the pending revision petition within a specified time.
Whether this writ petition should be disposed of with directions to the revenue department.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Kumarasamy
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The District Collector, Sivagangai District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai
The Tahsildar, Karaikudi
The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi
R. Subbiah
R. Tharani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
