A.Palanisamy v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.(MD) No.7704 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015
A.Palanisamy ... Petitioner
vs.
Trichy District.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents not to alter the nature of the property and further desist the respondents from granting patta to any person in respect of survey Number 282 for an extent of 5 acres situated at Kumbakurichi, Sethurapatti Village, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District by considering the representation dated 21.03.2015 of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (AD-I)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-)
To
SSL
TE/SV/SAR-2 : 23/11/2018 : 2P/5C
W.P.(MD) No.7704 of 2015 30.10.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Palanisamy
The District Collector, Trichy District
The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District
The President, Sethurapatti Village Panchayat, Trichy District
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court