Disposed

Santhosh, S/O.K.Raja, v. the Vice Chancellor

Madras HC23 Apr 2018WP(MD)/7054/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged his suspension from college and sought permission to attend classes and write examinations. Court granted liberty for petitioner to offer an apology to second respondent for permission to rejoin the course within two days.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to offer written apology; upon receipt, second respondent must permit petitioner to redo course within two days.

Santhosh, S/O.K.Raja, Vs the Vice Chancellor — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.04.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.7054 of 2018

Santhosh

... Petitioner

vs.

The Vice Chancellor,

¶9

Madurai Kamaraj University,

¶10

Palkalai Nagar, Madurai.

¶11

The Principal, The American College, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to attend the college and to write the examination.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arputharaj For Respondents No.1 : Mr.Amelgin Mohan for Issac Chambers No.2 : Mr.M.E.Ilango

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Quoting certain misbehaviors on the part of the petitioner and some other students, the petitioner was suspended from the college on recommendation of the college disciplinary committee's report dated 13.10.2017.

¶16

Today (23.04.2018) when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in an identical cases, the persons who had involved in the incident had approached this Court and this Court by an order dated 14.02.2018 passed an order in W.P. Nos.24015 and 20417 of 2017 permitted them to redo the course.

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that if the petitioner tenders written apology to the college authorities, the same would be considered for the purpose of permitting him to rejoin the course.

¶18

In view of the submissions made by both the counsels, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the second respondent with a letter of apology and on receipt of such apology letter, the second respondent shall permit him to redo the course namely B.Sc., (Bio Chemistry) third year. Such an exercise of taking the decision https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ shall be made within a period of two days from the date on which the petitioner tenders his written apology.

¶19

¶20

With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶21

/True copy/

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(RTI) Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

To:

¶24

The Vice Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai.

¶25

The Principal, The American College, Madurai.

¶26

1 CC TO MR.A.Arputharaj , ADVOCATE IN SR No.62792 + 1 CC TO Isaac Chambers IN SR No.63450 + 1 CC TO MR.M.E.Ilango , ADVOCATE IN SR No.62813

¶27

aav

¶28

KK/SV MMS/SAR 2/17/05/2018/2p/6c

¶29

W.P.(MD) No.7054 of 2018

¶30

23.04.2018

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Santhosh, S/O.K.Raja, v. the Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhosh, S/O.K.Raja, v. the Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.R.a.O.Mari Vs the Manager

M.Meenakshi Sundaram Vs the Director of Medical

E.T.Seenivasan, Vs K.Ramesh, S/O.M.Krishnan

Muthuraj,N. Vs the District Collector

Muthumani Vs the District Collector

Arul Leo Jones, Vs the Registrar, Anna University