Mayakrishnan v. the Regional Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner's son had already been granted an educational loan on 11.04.2017, rendering the Writ Petition praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus infructuous; the W.P. is closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P.(MD) No. 6401 of 2018
Mayakrishnan ... Petitioner
vs. 1. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India Regional Business Office-2, Beach Road, Thoothukudi. 2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Aviyur Branch, No.4/28, Kurandi Main road, Aviyur, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Principal. Sethu Institute of Technology, Pulloor, Kariappati, Virudhunagar District- 626 115. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to grant education loan to the petitioner's son Alaguraja. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr.C.Karthik No.3 : No appearance.
O R D E R
When the matter was called today (i.e.,28.04.2018), the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent submitted that the petitioner's son had already been granted educational loan on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 11.04.2017 and as such the prayer in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mayakrishnan
- respondent
The Regional Manager, State Bank of India
- respondent
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India
- respondent
The Principal, Sethu Institute of Technology
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court