Disposed

Varatha Rengarasan, v. the District Collector

Madras HC13 Mar 2018WP(MD)/5223/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a public interest litigation. It directed the Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police to consider a representation and take action on merits against operators running an unauthorized toddy shop within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Director the Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police to consider a representation and take action on merits against the private respondents on notice within eight weeks.

Varatha Rengarasan, Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.03.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5223 of 2018

¶7

Varatha Rengarasan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶10

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶11

3.The Inspector of Police, Peravoorani Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶12

4.Prabhakaran

¶13

5.Srinivasan Ambalam ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary action against the fourth respondent for conducting unauthorized toddy shop at Kalyanaramapuram, Peravoorani Taluk, Thanjavur District.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ramu For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.C.M.Marichelliah Prabhu,

¶16

Additional Government Pleader.

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.)

¶19

By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶20

2.This Writ Petition is styled as a 'Public Interest https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Litigation' and the petitioner alleges that the fourth and fifth respondents are illegally running a toddy shop at Kalyanaramapuram,

¶21

¶22

Peravoorani Taluk, Thanjavur District and though it has been brought to the knowledge of the official respondents, no action, whatsoever, has been taken and therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by filing this Writ Petition.

¶23

3.Heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who would submit that yesterday ie., on 12.03.2018, toddy shop illegally run by the respondents 4 and 5 is ordered to be shut down and no further action is taken against them.

¶24

4.Mr.C.M.Marichellaih Prabhu, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and seeks time to get instructions.

¶25

5.This Court, taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, directs the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.02.2015, after putting the respondents 4 and 5, on notice, shall take further action on the said representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner as well as to the respondents 4 and 5.

¶26

6.The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(C.O) /True Copy/

¶29

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶32

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶33

3.The Inspector of Police, Peravoorani Police Station, Thanjavur District. +One cc to Mr.M.Ramu, Advocate, SR.No.54793 +One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.55727 ps RL/6C/2P/JC/SAR1/27/3/2018

¶34

W.P(MD)No.5223 of 2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

13.03.2018

Varatha Rengarasan, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Varatha Rengarasan, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Jeyaraman Chettiyar, Vs the District Collector

Mathiyalagan, Vs the Commissioner

G.Chandra, W/O.Gopal, Vs the District Collector

P.Ramanathan Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Thirupathi Gas Service Vs Union of India

P.Selvam, Vs the District Collector