The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed for reinstatement and continuity of service. The court upheld the withdrawal by the petitioner's counsel and directed the return of certificates if any.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; 6th respondent directed to return certificates, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 23.11.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.(MD)No.5198 of 2014
Valar Akilan ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Director, Central Board of Secondary Education, “Shilksha Kendra”, 2,Community Centre, Preet Vihar Delhi – 110 301. 2.The Secretary, School Educational Department, Tamilnadu, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Regional Director, Central Board of Secondary Education, Plot No.1630, A.J.Block, 16th Main Road, Chennai – 600 040. 4.The Director, School Education Department, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai. 5.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 6.The Correspondent, Adarsh Vidhya Kendra School, Pioneer Compound, Vetturimadam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take necessary action on the basis of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner's representation dated 31.08.2012 and consequently, direct the 6th respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity
2
of service and prove all the attendant benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mrs.S.Srimathy, Spl.G.P. For R5 ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The 6th respondent is directed to return the certificates of the petitioner, if any.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(cs-II)
TO
1.The Director, Central Board of Secondary Education, “Shilksha Kendra”, 2,Community Centre, Preet Vihar Delhi – 110 301. 2.The Secretary, School Educational Department, Tamilnadu, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Regional Director, Central Board of Secondary Education, Plot No.1630, A.J.Block, 16th Main Road, Chennai – 600 040. 4.The Director, School Education Department, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai. 5.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 6.The Correspondent, Adarsh Vidhya Kendra School, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Pioneer Compound, Vetturimadam,
3
Nagercoil,
+1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.96812 +1cc to Mr.V.M.Bala Mohan Advocate in SR.No.96749
W.P.(MD)No.5198 of 2014
ARUL
SPSKN SAR2 24.12.2018 3P 9C
Valar Akilan
Director, Central Board of Secondary Education
Secretary, School Educational Department, Tamilnadu
Regional Director, Central Board of Secondary Education
Director, School Education Department
Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
