The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition regarding a property representation matter. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition.
Permission granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 14.11.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P(MD)No.22724 of 2018
S.L.Naganath ..Petitioner Vs. 1.P.Panneer Selvam
2.The Joint Sub Registrar-I, (District Registrar Level), Office of the District Registrar, Madurai South,Madurai 625 001. ..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.10.2018 in respect of the property bearing S.No. 198, Plot No. PC No. 26/3, having extent of 442, Sq. Mt., I.e nearly 10.5 Cents situated at Anuppanadi Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Baskaran For R1 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(T&P)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
To,
The Joint Sub Registrar-I, (District Registrar Level), Office of the District Registrar, Madurai South,Madurai 625 001.
+1CC to the Special Government Pleader SR.No. 95403
W.P(MD)No.22724 of 2018 14.11.2018
ES/SKN/RSK/SAR 1/10.12.2018/1P/3C
S.L.Naganath
P.Panneer Selvam
The Joint Sub Registrar-I, (District Registrar Level), Office of the District Registrar, Madurai South,Madurai 625 001
V.Bhavani Subbaroyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
